<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for 0-6.ie</title>
	<atom:link href="http://0-6.ie/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://0-6.ie</link>
	<description>Join the debate on children&#039;s early years</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:15:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 14% complete? by Liz Butler</title>
		<link>http://0-6.ie/2012/01/24/14-complete/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz Butler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://0-6.ie/?p=96#comment-52</guid>
		<description>All the latest research, just like all the oldest research, by my reading screams that child poverty is the biggest predictor of a life of disadvantage. Cutbacks to families need to be seen not just as vicious and cruel today but as very misguided in terms of society in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All the latest research, just like all the oldest research, by my reading screams that child poverty is the biggest predictor of a life of disadvantage. Cutbacks to families need to be seen not just as vicious and cruel today but as very misguided in terms of society in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 14% complete? by Pamela Purcell</title>
		<link>http://0-6.ie/2012/01/24/14-complete/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Pamela Purcell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 12:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://0-6.ie/?p=96#comment-48</guid>
		<description>All the latest research confirms what we who have been working in early childhood education have always known.  QUALITY Education for All pre schoolers is fundemental to our children&#039;s development as fully rounded and productive future adults and citizens.  It is absolutely worth the intestment economically as the future benefits to society are both socially and financially incalculable!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All the latest research confirms what we who have been working in early childhood education have always known.  QUALITY Education for All pre schoolers is fundemental to our children&#8217;s development as fully rounded and productive future adults and citizens.  It is absolutely worth the intestment economically as the future benefits to society are both socially and financially incalculable!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Quality and the National Children&#8217;s Strategy by Andrew</title>
		<link>http://0-6.ie/2011/12/16/quality-and-the-national-childrens-strategy/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 15:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://0-6.ie/?p=83#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Supporting students is a lot of responsibility too Lyn.  I was out with a service yesterday and their current student is not working out very well.  Its only the second time this childcare leader has come up against this and I could see it was taking a toll.  She was conflicted by the issue.  She was going over the implications of this students attitude and work ethic to early years.  I could see that she wanted to try support the student, but deep down realised that she was probably not suitable for the sector, and possibly never would be.  

She was balancing this against how a poor report would impact her studies and that the student had given so much time already to get to where she was.  I thnk that anyone working in this sector has a predisposition to be caring and supportive full stop.  Having to confront a student who appears to be not suitable and perhaps undermining her future job prospects is hard.  It&#039;s a big responsibility to carry.  

Yet I feel that she would put the children, that this student may have a connection with in the future, first.  A hard issue to cope with even if you were being paid and properly acknowledged for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Supporting students is a lot of responsibility too Lyn.  I was out with a service yesterday and their current student is not working out very well.  Its only the second time this childcare leader has come up against this and I could see it was taking a toll.  She was conflicted by the issue.  She was going over the implications of this students attitude and work ethic to early years.  I could see that she wanted to try support the student, but deep down realised that she was probably not suitable for the sector, and possibly never would be.  </p>
<p>She was balancing this against how a poor report would impact her studies and that the student had given so much time already to get to where she was.  I thnk that anyone working in this sector has a predisposition to be caring and supportive full stop.  Having to confront a student who appears to be not suitable and perhaps undermining her future job prospects is hard.  It&#8217;s a big responsibility to carry.  </p>
<p>Yet I feel that she would put the children, that this student may have a connection with in the future, first.  A hard issue to cope with even if you were being paid and properly acknowledged for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Quality and the National Children&#8217;s Strategy by Rebecca Sherry Glennon</title>
		<link>http://0-6.ie/2011/12/16/quality-and-the-national-childrens-strategy/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca Sherry Glennon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 19:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://0-6.ie/?p=83#comment-7</guid>
		<description>You are so right Lynn - we do often equate quality with monetary value, and this shouldn&#039;t be the case. I think we often feel that to be valued as an early years worker we need to put a monetary value on what we do.

I guess a lot of this comes down to so many of us feeling undervalued when trying to operate a business that people really do seem to resent paying a reasonable amount for a lot of the time, and now with our fees being decided by a higher power through the ECCE we really are having a monetary value outside of our control placed on our work.

Our work encompasses so much more than the hours of contact child care - accounts, preparation, cleaning, paper work - for the HSE, the ECCE, Aistear...... I think a lot of people outside of the service forget this.

But back to my first instance of agreeing with you - having someone of a professional nature enter your setting and give positive feedback and praise for the work being done and advise on how to improve is incredibly rewarding.

A mentor system would provide this incredibly well.

I was given a little tatse of it when i had my HSE inspection recently. Up until now I felt slightly intimidated by the inspections - and I know I&#039;m not the only one - I felt as though i was in combat instead of working with them and it was a real shame.
No acknowledgement was ever made of the high level of standard I keep or the quality of the activities done with the children, or the high level of qualifications achieved by my staff - infact very few postive comments were ever received which is incredibly disheartening in this business - or indeed any business.
This visit however the inpector actually started her summation with hugely positive comments and praise and then carried on to the usual policy updates and recommendations - which were given in a matter of fact way - not the usual intimidating, over offical way.

This was very, very uplifting - to recieve postive affirmations from another professional body.

Perhaps if we had more of this type of positive reinforcement on a regualr basis instead of feeling like we are being bombarded with rules and paperwork and enforced pricing and continuous inspection - the morale of the whole sector could be lifted and we could begin to feel more positive about engaging with the need for maintaining quality and the National Strategy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are so right Lynn &#8211; we do often equate quality with monetary value, and this shouldn&#8217;t be the case. I think we often feel that to be valued as an early years worker we need to put a monetary value on what we do.</p>
<p>I guess a lot of this comes down to so many of us feeling undervalued when trying to operate a business that people really do seem to resent paying a reasonable amount for a lot of the time, and now with our fees being decided by a higher power through the ECCE we really are having a monetary value outside of our control placed on our work.</p>
<p>Our work encompasses so much more than the hours of contact child care &#8211; accounts, preparation, cleaning, paper work &#8211; for the HSE, the ECCE, Aistear&#8230;&#8230; I think a lot of people outside of the service forget this.</p>
<p>But back to my first instance of agreeing with you &#8211; having someone of a professional nature enter your setting and give positive feedback and praise for the work being done and advise on how to improve is incredibly rewarding.</p>
<p>A mentor system would provide this incredibly well.</p>
<p>I was given a little tatse of it when i had my HSE inspection recently. Up until now I felt slightly intimidated by the inspections &#8211; and I know I&#8217;m not the only one &#8211; I felt as though i was in combat instead of working with them and it was a real shame.<br />
No acknowledgement was ever made of the high level of standard I keep or the quality of the activities done with the children, or the high level of qualifications achieved by my staff &#8211; infact very few postive comments were ever received which is incredibly disheartening in this business &#8211; or indeed any business.<br />
This visit however the inpector actually started her summation with hugely positive comments and praise and then carried on to the usual policy updates and recommendations &#8211; which were given in a matter of fact way &#8211; not the usual intimidating, over offical way.</p>
<p>This was very, very uplifting &#8211; to recieve postive affirmations from another professional body.</p>
<p>Perhaps if we had more of this type of positive reinforcement on a regualr basis instead of feeling like we are being bombarded with rules and paperwork and enforced pricing and continuous inspection &#8211; the morale of the whole sector could be lifted and we could begin to feel more positive about engaging with the need for maintaining quality and the National Strategy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What next? by Andrew</title>
		<link>http://0-6.ie/2011/12/14/what-next/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 15:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://0-6.ie/?p=73#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Sounds like it was an excellent day, with lots of great ideas and passion. Well done to you all. It&#039;s how to capture all this and have it actually included in any forthcoming strategy that will be so important.  There seems to be a sense that early years is just about the ECCE at the political level at this point.  Hopefully the energy and passion that was there yesterday, will still be evident to input into the consultation process and will be evident in any finished product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like it was an excellent day, with lots of great ideas and passion. Well done to you all. It&#8217;s how to capture all this and have it actually included in any forthcoming strategy that will be so important.  There seems to be a sense that early years is just about the ECCE at the political level at this point.  Hopefully the energy and passion that was there yesterday, will still be evident to input into the consultation process and will be evident in any finished product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A moment of transformation by Leanne</title>
		<link>http://0-6.ie/2011/12/09/a-moment-of-transformation-2/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Leanne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 21:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://0-6.ie/?p=57#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Why do childcare workers have to do child protection and teachers that is providing an education to primary and secondary kids dont have to? Why are the excempt from this training? The ratios are gone up 1:11 Why dont  primary school have ratios?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do childcare workers have to do child protection and teachers that is providing an education to primary and secondary kids dont have to? Why are the excempt from this training? The ratios are gone up 1:11 Why dont  primary school have ratios?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Budget 2012 by Andrew</title>
		<link>http://0-6.ie/2011/12/11/budget-2012/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 15:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://0-6.ie/?p=59#comment-4</guid>
		<description>One concern is that the estimates of expenditure for DCYA highlight that there will be an increase in savings from the Community Childcare Subvention next year again - the document states that the saving this year is €1.6 million and next year 2013 they project a saving of €3.6million.  This could include the CETS scheme also, but it is still a big incremental hit, particularly as CCS is only liable to grow with the rise in unemployment and &quot;activation&quot; projects.  CETS certainly can&#039;t take the demand

CCS has seen a lot of issues this year, a particular hit is that there will be no second application for places.  Any new parents will possibly be accomodated via the &quot;contingency&quot; which is supposed to cover all and any emergencies a service might have during the year.  More likely, it will mean childcare managers having to refuse a place or go seeking some top up funding from SVP or others.

It&#039;s a lot of pressure to have baring down on childcare services and their underpaid staff!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One concern is that the estimates of expenditure for DCYA highlight that there will be an increase in savings from the Community Childcare Subvention next year again &#8211; the document states that the saving this year is €1.6 million and next year 2013 they project a saving of €3.6million.  This could include the CETS scheme also, but it is still a big incremental hit, particularly as CCS is only liable to grow with the rise in unemployment and &#8220;activation&#8221; projects.  CETS certainly can&#8217;t take the demand</p>
<p>CCS has seen a lot of issues this year, a particular hit is that there will be no second application for places.  Any new parents will possibly be accomodated via the &#8220;contingency&#8221; which is supposed to cover all and any emergencies a service might have during the year.  More likely, it will mean childcare managers having to refuse a place or go seeking some top up funding from SVP or others.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a lot of pressure to have baring down on childcare services and their underpaid staff!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Budget 2012 by steve goode</title>
		<link>http://0-6.ie/2011/12/11/budget-2012/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>steve goode</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 13:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://0-6.ie/?p=59#comment-3</guid>
		<description>some practical issues some groups may not be able to increase their numbers from 20 to 22 due to space and in some areas there is a surplus of preschools places so hard to incease numbers.
This means that the preschool providers will have to bear the reductions in income once again indivduals have to pay for government policies. The cost is on a few few to support many.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>some practical issues some groups may not be able to increase their numbers from 20 to 22 due to space and in some areas there is a surplus of preschools places so hard to incease numbers.<br />
This means that the preschool providers will have to bear the reductions in income once again indivduals have to pay for government policies. The cost is on a few few to support many.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

